Built by an operator who's personally settled $3.5M+ in pre-lit across 200+ files — not a staffing company. We extend your plaintiff PI practice with senior pre-lit support: demand drafting, treatment & lien coordination, and adjuster negotiation.
And what changes when the people doing the work have actually done the work — and don't leave you holding the bag.
Staffing companies place people who've never worked a PI file. Your senior staff — the ones billing many times their hourly cost — end up training them. Then the trained person leaves, and you start over from zero. You paid to educate someone else's employee.
Pre-lit is judgment work, and continuity is everything. You shouldn't be training someone else's hire, and your files shouldn't stall the moment a placement turns over. The fix is a senior, vetted bench — not a résumé pulled off a job board.
Every team member is vetted and trained 1:1 over three months — by me, or by someone who's settled $5M+ in pre-lit — before they touch your files. And a reserve team keeps your work moving, so nothing is held up until you have a placement you're satisfied with.
Pick one. Pick all six on the Services page. We've structured our work the way a senior pre-lit hire would have — without the $90K salary or the turnover.
We've handled files across all five — and we know they're not interchangeable. No-fault PIP states, LOP-heavy practice, Stowers and Soriano demands, pure vs. modified comparative fault. The strategy starts at the first demand letter.
No "transformation roadmaps." No quarterly business reviews. We start with a call and end with files closing faster.
The ones we get on the first call, in roughly this order.
Twenty minutes. No pitch deck. We'll tell you in the first five whether this makes sense for your firm.
Month-to-month retainers. Cancel any month with 30 days' notice. No setup fees, no implementation packages. You pay for senior pre-lit work backed by a reserve bench — not for a customer success manager.
Six modules. Pick all of them, or the one your firm bleeds time on. Each can be scoped within a Tier II or Tier III retainer.
The single highest-leverage document in any pre-lit file — written to make the value obvious before anyone picks up the phone.
We don't impose our own approach. We execute your strategy on the file, exactly as the attorney intends it.
Making sure the client gets to the right treatment — because under-treatment is where files quietly lose their value.
Where most files quietly leak the client's net recovery. We claw it back.
Always attorney-supervised. We prepare the moves and the intelligence; the attorney makes the call.
The three-month program that means you never train someone else's hire again.
Your malpractice carrier will ask about this on every engagement. Here's what we already have.
That's the Pilot. If you're not satisfied with the work, you walk away. The rest of this site is just to help you decide.
This is not a staffing company. It's an operator-led pre-lit practice — the kind of firm I wanted to hire when I was the one drowning in demand letters.
I spent years inside plaintiff PI work — first managing cases, then negotiating files — and personally settled $3.5M+ in pre-litigation across more than 200 cases handled start-to-finish: intake, treatment, demand, adjuster, disbursement. Florida, Ohio, Massachusetts, Washington, Texas.
What I saw, over and over, was the same problem from the attorney's side of the desk. They'd hire outsourced help — Legal Soft, Stafi, Omega, whichever. The help would be a generalist who'd never worked PI. The firm's senior people would spend their expensive hours training them. And once they were finally useful, they'd leave — and the firm would start again from zero.
So I built the opposite. A small, deliberately senior team, every member vetted and trained 1:1 over three months on the same playbook I used to settle the cases that built my résumé — with a reserve bench so a client's work never stalls between placements.
Our engagement letters state it plainly: the attorney retains sole legal judgment on all matters; our team performs paralegal and case-management functions only; every final decision on demands, settlements, and communications with adjusters and clients is reviewed and authorized by the attorney. We do not give legal advice. We draft; you decide. UPL-safety language is included in every MSA.
The entity is a U.S. LLC; I lead the practice from Pakistan. The operational team works across Ecuador, Colombia, and the Philippines — chosen for legal aptitude and for time-zone coverage that spans every U.S. business hour, ET to PT. Everyone is trained by me, or by someone who's personally settled over $5 million in pre-lit and built the cases behind that number over years in practice. We keep the team deliberately small. Quality through growth is harder than growth — and quality is the only reason an attorney refers us.
Distributed doesn't mean unaccountable — with us it means the opposite, because everything is measured. Every team member works on Hubstaff: time tracked to the minute against your files, with activity levels and periodic screenshots logged throughout the day. You receive end-of-day reports showing exactly what moved on your cases. And we monitor activity across softphones and inside your legal software — SmartAdvocate, AlphaLaw, Filevine, CASEpeer, MyCase — so every call, note, and file update is visible and auditable. In practice, you get more transparency into our work than you have into most people sitting in your own office.
Twelve files personally handled by the founder, in three categories: demand packages, treatment & records, and negotiation & liens. Firm names, claimants, carriers, and identifying details have been anonymized. Amounts and timelines are real. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes.
Carrier opened at $42K and hung its valuation on a six-week treatment gap. We re-drafted the chronology to front-load the gap's explanation — lost coverage, documented attempts to find affordable PT — and added an ER 904 analysis plus a regional comp set. Two sequenced counters and an IFCA threat at day 21.
Carrier sat at $18.5K on a clear-liability file. We drafted a time-limited, within-limits Stowers demand with explicit bad-faith framing and a Soriano-aware structure for the multi-claimant exposure, benchmarked against published Harris County verdicts. Carrier tendered limits on day 18.
Florida soft-tissue file with PIP exhausted and treatment under LOP. We built the demand around the doctors' written opinions and impairment language Colossus weights, organized the LOP balances cleanly, and the carrier's first offer came in 3x its usual opener for the injury class.
Massachusetts no-fault file where the prior demand had blurred the PIP and third-party layers. We separated the PIP recovery from the bodily-injury demand, documented wage loss with employer declarations, and pushed the third-party claim on its own merits. Settled at $118K.
Client reported memory and focus issues that weren't being worked up. We coordinated a neurology referral and formal neuropsychological evaluation, which documented a mild TBI the file had been treating as a simple concussion. The objective findings reset the entire damages picture.
A herniation was being managed conservatively with no specialist on file. We routed the client to an orthopedic surgeon, secured an MRI, and documented the surgical recommendation and impairment rating — turning a soft-tissue-looking file into a clearly surgical one for valuation.
The client had dropped out of care for nine weeks — the kind of gap carriers feast on. We re-engaged them, coordinated a PT and chiropractic restart, and documented the reason for the lapse contemporaneously so the chronology told one coherent story instead of two broken ones.
Radicular symptoms with no diagnostic backbone. We assembled a pain-management referral, MRI, and an epidural injection series, then sequenced the records so the demand showed a logical progression — conservative care, imaging, intervention — that carriers value far above scattered visits.
The hospital filed a $47K lien that gutted the client's net. We audited every line item, found $11K in charges with no matching record, repriced the disputed items using cost-to-charge ratios, and demanded a reduction citing comparative-fault apportionment. Lien settled at $29K.
Three LOP providers were carrying inflated balances against a modest settlement. We negotiated each LOP payoff and resolved the PIP coordination, benchmarking charges against usual-and-customary rates. Combined reductions put thousands back into the client's pocket at disbursement.
The carrier had gone silent for 90 days. Our catalogue flagged this adjuster's pattern — slow to open, responsive to supplemental documentation. We sent a targeted supplemental demand and a disciplined follow-up cadence; the first offer landed within ten days, then climbed.
We built the attorney a one-page evaluation memo — comps, exposure range, and a recommended floor — so the firm could value the case rightly up front. With expectations set on both sides, the file resolved inside the attorney's evaluation, beating the second and third offers without filing suit.
All case studies describe work personally handled by the founder during prior engagements. Firm names, claimant identities, carrier names, claim numbers, and any details that could identify the matter have been redacted or generalized. Settlement amounts and timelines are real but anonymized. Past results do not guarantee future outcomes. Nothing on this page constitutes legal advice or the establishment of an attorney-client relationship.
The Pilot is built for exactly this question. Five of your active files. Thirty days. We show you what we'd do differently.
Tell us what's clogging your pre-lit pipeline. We'll tell you in five minutes whether we can help. If we can't, we'll tell you who can.
The first call is always with me — not a project manager, not a sales rep. Twenty minutes, structured, no slides. We'll walk through your current pre-lit workflow, find the two or three places where time leaks, and decide together whether a Pilot makes sense.